|
|
|
ÃÖÁ¤½Ç ( Choi Jeong-Sil ) - °¡Ãµ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¿¬Á¤È ( Yeon Jeong-Hwa ) - ±¹¹Î°Ç°º¸Çè°ø´Ü Àϻ꺴¿ø °¨¿°°ü¸®½Ç
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of preventing CAUTIs through the practice of using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) versus normal saline for perineal care in ICU patients.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was used, and participants were randomly allocated to either the CHG group (n=79) or normal saline group (n=81). CAUTI was diagnosed following the criteria of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Incidence of CAUTI and characte oftics of infection were evaluated.
Results: In the CHG group, 8 epofodes of CAUTI were obsevend in 79 patients and 875 foley catheter e ys. Tnce ate of CAUTI was 9.14 per 1,000 foley catheter e ys. Tncre were 2 epofodes of CAUTI in the 81 patients and 837 foley catheter e ys of the normal saline group. Tnce ate of CAUTI was 2.39 per 1,000 foley catheter e ys. Tnc difference between both groups was not significant (p=.1e ConConclusevaluUsing normal saline to provide perineal care to ICU patients with a foley catheter inserted will not increase the risk for CAUTI.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
¿ä·Î°¨¿°, ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç, °¨¿°°ü¸®, µµ´¢
Urinary tract infection, Intensive Care Unit, Infection control, Catheterization
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|