0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ȸÀ½ºÎ °£È£½Ã Ŭ·Î¸£Çí½Ãµò°ú »ý¸®½Ä¿°¼ö Àû¿ë¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯Ä¡µµ´¢°ü °ü·Ã ¿ä·Î°¨¿° ¹ß»ý·ü ºñ±³

Effects of perineal care in preventing catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) in intensive care units (ICU)

±âº»°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2012³â 19±Ç 2È£ p.223 ~ 232
KMID : 0388320120190020223
ÃÖÁ¤½Ç ( Choi Jeong-Sil ) - °¡Ãµ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

¿¬Á¤È­ ( Yeon Jeong-Hwa ) - ±¹¹Î°Ç°­º¸Çè°ø´Ü Àϻ꺴¿ø °¨¿°°ü¸®½Ç

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of preventing CAUTIs through the practice of using 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) versus normal saline for perineal care in ICU patients.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was used, and participants were randomly allocated to either the CHG group (n=79) or normal saline group (n=81). CAUTI was diagnosed following the criteria of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Incidence of CAUTI and characte oftics of infection were evaluated.

Results: In the CHG group, 8 epofodes of CAUTI were obsevend in 79 patients and 875 foley catheter e ys. Tnce ate of CAUTI was 9.14 per 1,000 foley catheter e ys. Tncre were 2 epofodes of CAUTI in the 81 patients and 837 foley catheter e ys of the normal saline group. Tnce ate of CAUTI was 2.39 per 1,000 foley catheter e ys. Tnc difference between both groups was not significant (p=.1e ConConclusevaluUsing normal saline to provide perineal care to ICU patients with a foley catheter inserted will not increase the risk for CAUTI.
KeyWords
¿ä·Î°¨¿°, ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç, °¨¿°°ü¸®, µµ´¢
Urinary tract infection, Intensive Care Unit, Infection control, Catheterization
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed